When developing a treatment protocol policy using evidence-based medicine, which of the following is MOST appropriate?

When developing a treatment protocol policy using evidence-based medicine, which of the following is MOST appropriate?

• A. Consult experts in the athletic training field.
• B. Conduct a thorough internet search for current practices.
• C. Conduct a thorough review of the literature.
• D. Discuss the protocol with other athletic training professionals.

Answer: (C)

In evidence-based practice, policies should be grounded in the best available research. For a treatment protocol policy, a thorough review of the literature is the most reliable starting point because it systematically gathers and evaluates high-quality studies, such as randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews, to determine what truly works, for whom, and under what conditions. This process provides a transparent rationale, helps assess risks and benefits, and highlights gaps or uncertainties that may affect implementation. While consulting field experts, performing internet searches, or discussing with colleagues can inform and contextualize the policy, these sources alone are not as rigorous or generalizable as a well-conducted literature review, and they may introduce bias or outdated information. By grounding policies in a comprehensive literature review, you ensure the protocol is evidence-based, defensible, and adaptable as new research emerges.

In evidence-based practice, policies should be grounded in the best available research. For a treatment protocol policy, a thorough review of the literature is the most reliable starting point because it systematically gathers and evaluates high-quality studies, such as randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews, to determine what truly works, for whom, and under what conditions. This process provides a transparent rationale, helps assess risks and benefits, and highlights gaps or uncertainties that may affect implementation. While consulting field experts, performing internet searches, or discussing with colleagues can inform and contextualize the policy, these sources alone are not as rigorous or generalizable as a well-conducted literature review, and they may introduce bias or outdated information. By grounding policies in a comprehensive literature review, you ensure the protocol is evidence-based, defensible, and adaptable as new research emerges.